BREAKING NEWS

BREAKING NEWS ""**If we want PSU bank to compete with Pvt bank ---Give them a break Saturday first*** DA FOR BANKER FROM FEBRUARY 2023 SEE DETAILS CHART FOR OFFICER AND WORKMAN***Outcome of Today’s meeting with IBA - 31.01.2023***All India Bank Strike 27.06.2022******PLEASE VISIT INDIAN TOURISM CULTURE & HERITAGE *****NITI Aayog finalised names of Two public sector banks and one general Insurance Co. for privatisation****No economic reason to privatise PSU banks---post date 24.05.2021******Mobile users may soon be able to switch from postpaid to prepaid and vice versa using OTP*****India May Privatise or Shut 46 PSUs in First 100 Days, Says NITI Aayog's Rajiv Kumar----We should start with the banks*****Expected DA for Bank Employee from August 2019 is 24 slab to 29 slab*****RTGS time window from 4:30 pm to 6:00 pm. with effect from June 01.06.2019******WITHOUT CUSTOMER'S CONSENT BANK CAN NOT USE AADHAAR FOR KYC ----RBI***** Salient features of Sukanya Samriddhi Account---Who can open and how?******OBC posts 39% rise in Q4 profit, OBC readt tWITHOUT CUSTOMER'S CONSENT BANK CAN NOT USE AADHAAR FOR KYC ----RBI o take another Bank--MD MUkesh Jain*******DA FOR BANKER FROM NOV 2018 IS INCREASE 66 SLAB I.E 6.60%****40,000 STANDARD DEDUCTION IN YOUR TAX - IS A GREAT DRAM/BLUFF BY JAITLY SEE DETAILS+++++++Cabinet approves plans to merge PSU banks-The final scheme will be notified by the central government in consultation with the Reserve Bank. post date 23.08.2017****IBA to restrict the negotiations on Charter of Demands of Officers' Associations up to Scale-III only post dated 07.07.2017*****

VISITOR FROM WORLD

Free counters!

YOU ARE VISITOR

Blog Archive

LIVE

BREAKING NEWS ""**If we want PSU bank to compete with Pvt bank ---Give them a break Saturday first****Outcome of Today’s meeting with IBA - 31.01.2023*********

Wednesday, February 28, 2024

High Court orders RBI to pay compensation for denying maternity leave of Female Employee

The Kolkata High Court ruled that there should be no discrimination between regular and contract employees regarding the rights of childbirth and maternity leave. A petitioner, appointed on a contract basis for three years from August 16, 2011, as an executive trainee in the RBI, had challenged the top bank’s failure to grant maternity leave with pay for 180 days.

Justice Raja Basu Choudhury, in his verdict on Monday, stated that there should be no discrimination between regular and contract employees working in the bank on issues related to the birth of a child and maternity leave rights. The court directed the Lead Bank to compensate her for the period she was denied leave with pay.

Considering that the RBI generally provides maternity benefits to its employees as per its master circular, the judge stated, “Denying the petitioner such benefits, in my opinion, is a discriminatory act as its purpose is to create a distinction within a class, which is not permissible.”

The court declared this to be a violation of Article 14 of the Indian Constitution. It emphasized that refusing maternity leave to the petitioner is a discriminatory act and a contravention of the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961.

Justice Basu Choudhury remarked that if the RBI is allowed to deprive the petitioner of her fundamental right to maternity benefits and only grant leave without pay, it would be akin to forcing an employee to work during her pregnancy, posing risks to both her and the fetus. The court stated, “If permitted, it would defeat the purpose of social justice.”


No comments:

Home Loan Outstanding Hits Record High of Rs 27.23 Lakh Crore

According to data from the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) on ‘Sectoral Deployment of Bank Credit’,  outstanding credit in the housing sector in...

script async src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js">