BREAKING NEWS

BREAKING NEWS ""**Banks will remain closed from 2nd to 4th March 2026

VISITOR FROM WORLD

Free counters!

YOU ARE VISITOR

Blog Archive

LIVE

BREAKING NEWS ""**If we want PSU bank to compete with Pvt bank ---Give them a break Saturday first****Outcome of Today’s meeting with IBA - 31.01.2023*********

Thursday, March 26, 2026

EXPECTED DA FOR BANKER FROM MAY 2026 -WE WILL UPDATE AGAIN ON 30.03.2026

Expected DA Calculation Updated on 27.02.26 on the basis of CPI for the month of Jan'26 with the assumptions of CPI for Feb. & Mar'26. The CPI for the month of Jan'26 announced on 27.02.26 as 148.6 with an increase of 0.40 points from Dec'25. (as per revised base year 2016) (The base year was changed from Oct 2020)

  1. Keeping in view of recent CPI announced , we may assume there would be an increase in CPI index by 0.50 points in the next both months. Accordingly, on this assumption, we may expect there would be an increase of 1.07% DA in terms of 12th BPS on revised pay. Total 26.07% DA will become payable from May'26.
  2. On assumptions if there is an increase in CPI index by 0.40 points in the next both months, we may expect there would be be an increase of 0.97% DA in terms of 12th BPS on revised pay. Total 25.97 percentage of DA will become payable from May'26.
  3. On assumptions if there is an increase in CPI index by 0.30 points in the next boths months, we may expect there would be be an increase of 0.87% DA in terms of 12th BPS on revised pay. Total 25.87 percentage of DA will become payable from May'26.

Big Home Loan Fraud in Central Bank of India, 10 People convicted by CBI

A special CBI Court in Mumbai on Tuesday convicted a retired bank manager and nine others in a 2004 home loan fraud case. The court gave prison sentences ranging from one year to five years.

Brothers Kashinath Jadhav and Ganesh Pandurang Jadhav were the main accused in the case. The court sentenced them to five years in jail. Former bank official Metha Sastry was given one year of imprisonment under the Prevention of Corruption Act.

Sastry was a senior manager at the Central Bank of India branch in Prabhadevi, Mumbai. The court said he failed to carry out required checks before and after sanctioning the loans. If these checks had been done, the fraud could have been detected earlier.

Another bank official, Narain Mathur, who was a chief manager, died during the 20-year trial. So, the charges against him were closed.


According to the prosecution, the accused used 17 fake sale agreements to apply for housing loans. They claimed that they were buying flats from Shreeram Sthapatya Construction in Spring Field Apartment in Vasai. However, in reality, no flats were purchased.

The Jadhav brothers also opened fake bank accounts in the name of the construction company at Punjab National Bank.

After the loans were approved by the Central Bank of India, the cheque payments were wrongly deposited into these fake accounts instead of going to the real builder. The money was then quickly withdrawn.

The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) said that bank officials did not properly verify the loan applicants, the purpose of the loan, or the documents. Loans worth ₹67.70 lakh were given, out of which ₹48.63 lakh remained unpaid

CBI Registers Rs 61.13 Crore Bank Fraud Case Against Laxmiroop Pvt Ltd

The Central Bureau of Investigation has registered a case against a metal company in a ₹61.13 crore bank fraud case. The company allegedly failed to repay loans taken from a group of banks led by Union Bank of India. It is also accused of using the loan money for purposes that were not approved.

The company, Laxmiroop Pvt Ltd, is based in Chhattisgarh. Its transactions with the banks between 2023 and 2025 are now under investigation. The group of banks also includes Federal Bank.

Due to non-payment of loans, the company’s account was declared a Non-Performing Asset (NPA) on February 26, 2025, by Union Bank of India. Later, Federal Bank reported the account as “fraud” to the Reserve Bank of India on June 16, 2025. Union Bank of India also reported it as fraud on September 23, 2025.

The FIR in this case was registered by the Mumbai unit of the Central Bureau of Investigation on February 13. It was based on a complaint filed by a Deputy General Manager of Union Bank of India. The case has been registered under sections related to criminal conspiracy, cheating, and misconduct under the Indian Penal Code and the Prevention of Corruption Act.

Saturday, March 21, 2026

THE PLI AMOUNT PAID TO MD & EDS OF DIFFERENT PUBLIC SECTOR BANK

PNB

MD&EDs will be paid Rs.1,00,67,530.31 as PLI. The PLI Amount that will be paid to MD&EDs is as follows:

S. No.Name of the WTDDesignationPLI Amount (₹)
1Shri Atul Kumar GoelFormer MD & CEO16,15,680.00
2Shri Ashok ChandraMD & CEO4,51,695.48
3Shri Kalyan KumarFormer ED19,53,600.00
4Shri Binod KumarFormer ED16,99,509.67
5Shri M. ParamasivamED21,50,400.00
6Shri Bibhu Prasad MahapatraED21,50,400.00
7Shri D SurendranED46,245.16

The Government has ordered Punjab National Bank to pay PLI to officers from Scale IV to Scale VIII as per the revised PLI guidelines issued by DFS, Ministry of Finance.

SBI

The PLI Amount that will be paid to MD&EDs is as follows:

S. No.Name of the WTDDesignationPLI Amount (₹)
1Shri Dinesh KharaFormer Chairman10,95,968.00
2Shri C S SettyChairman16,04,032.00
3Shri C S SettyFormer MD10,93,045.00
4Shri Ashwini Kumar TiwariMD26,92,800.00
5Shri Vinay M. TonseFormer MD26,73,300.00
6Shri Alok Kumar ChoudharyFormer MD6,73,200.00
7Shri Rana Ashutosh Kumar SinghMD17,51,768.00
8Shri Rama Mohan Rao AmaraMD7,74,542.00

BOB

The PLI Amount that will be paid to MD&EDs is as follows:

S. No.Name of the WTDDesignationPLI amount to be paid
1Shri Debadatta ChandMD & CEO16,15,680.00
2Shri Lalit TyagiED16,12,800.00
3Shri Sanjay Vinayak MudaliarED16,12,800.00
4Shri Lal SinghED16,12,800.00
5Smt Beena VaheedED10,40,516.40




INDIAN BANK

The PLI Amount that will be paid to MD&EDs is as follows:

S. No.Name of the WTDDesignationPLI Amount (₹)
1Shri S. L. JainFormer MD & CEO16,00,080.00
2Shri Binod KumarMD & CEO4,51,695.48
3Shri Mahesh Kumar BajajFormer ED17,87,760.00
4Shri Ashutosh ChoudharyED21,50,400.00
5Shri Shiv Bajrang SinghED21,50,400.00
6Shri Brajesh Kumar SinghED21,03,600.00

The Controversy of PLI in Banks, What happened in meeting on 9th March?

A big controversy has unfolded in the public sector banks in India. Yesterday, the Government of India sent letters to the banks to credit PLI to Scale IV and above officers. This new PLI scheme was introduced by the Government in 2024 and aims to provide Performance-Linked Incentive (PLI) to Scale IV and above officers.

But this scheme has been in controversy since its launch. Why? Let’s understand. This PLI scheme divides bank officers in two sections – Scale I to Scale III and Scale IV and above. Scale I to Scale III will get PLI of up to 15 days of the basic salary, whereas Scale IV will get PLI upto 70% of their annual basic pay. Scale V and VI officers can get 80% of their annual basic pay. Scale VII officers can get 90% of their annual basic pay. EDs and MDs can get PLI up to 100% of their annual basic pay.

The United Forum of Bank Unions (UFBU) has strictly opposed this PLI scheme. The matter reached the Office of Labour Commissioner. UFBU said that PLI should be paid proportionately to all Officers starting from Scale I. The latest meeting was held on 9th March 2026 between UFBU and the government representatives and it was decided to discuss further on this matter.

The unions warned that if the payment for officers from Scale IV and above is made under the new scheme, it could lead to significant cost escalation for banks, which may affect the banks’ profits and create other related issues.

The Chief Labour Commissioner (CLC) ordered IBA to provide details of the financial impact on Banks due to new PLI scheme. The CLC said that a letter would be written to DFS to pay PLI to Scale IV and above as per the old scheme. But yesterday, Govt ordered all Banks to credit PLI for Scale IV and above officers.

This has raised a lot of questions?

  • If the matter was under discussion, then how can Govt order Banks to credit PLI for Scale IV and above?
  • In the meeting, the DFS said clearly that PLI to Scale IV and above will be paid as per the new norms. Bank Unions did not mention any strict action against DFS if PLI is paid.
  • Earlier, the banks had credited the PLI for Scale I to Scale III, but Unions did not strongly object to this, and the matter has been pending at CLC for approximately a year. Had Unions taken strong action, the matter could have been resolved by now.
  • Why has the matter been under discussion for the last 1 year? This matter should have been resolved by now. Why did Bank Unions not try to resolve the matter at the earliest?

It seems Bank Unions are hiding something and Bank Officers are not happy with this. Bank Officers are severely criticizing Bank Unions on Social Media for not being able to resolve the issue of PLI.

Canara Bank has loan default of Rs 2.49 lakh crore; Total Default over Rs 29 lakh crore in PSU Banks

Canara Bank has loan default of Rs 2.49 lakh crore, according to data compiled by TransUnion CIBIL and examined by The Pioneer. Large defaults of 11 PSU banks exceed INR 29 lakh crore excluding Indian Bank as the bank has not yet submitted list of Large Defaulters for the past one year. Canara Bank has filed 14,277 suits across the country to recover these loans.

Company / GroupLoan Default Amount (₹ Crore)
Aircel (C. Sivasankaran)4,508
Shri Lakshmi Cotsyn3,982
Lanco Group3,852
Gammon Engineers3,425
MS Gupta Power Infrastructure3,303
IL&FS Group Companies3,237
Nicco Corporation2,815
Indure Pvt Ltd2,770
Winsome Diamonds & Jewellery2,550
PSL Limited2,373
Gayatri Projects2,342
Rajesh Exports2,285
Supreme Housing & Hospitality2,254
Rabirun Vinimay Pvt Ltd2,024
Jet Airways1,972
Alok Industries1,746
Jay Polychem1,714
Concast Steel & Power1,695
Anil Ambani Group Companies1,574
Era Group1,544
Jindal Steel & Power (guarantor case)1,487
Bhushan Power & Steel1,229
PEC India1,227
DHFL (Dewan Housing Finance Corporation)1,250
Forever Precious Jewellery & Diamonds1,364
Unitech Ltd937
Trimax IT Infrastructure & Services Ltd937
Gitanjali Group (Mehul Choksi, Nirav Modi)919
Mahendra Exports858
IVRCL790
BBT Elev RD747
Bibcol732
Gili India700
Transstroy India Pvt Ltd653

Among the borrowers are several high-profile corporate groups. Companies linked to debt-ridden industrialist Anil Ambani owe INR 1,574 crore to the bank. In one case, Jindal Steel and Power, headed by Naveen Jindal, is listed as personal guarantor for dues of INR 1,487 crore related to Reliance Communications. Insolvent Bhushan Power and Steel owes INR 1,229 crore, while PEC India owes INR 1,227 crore. The defunct Jet Airways owes INR 1,972 crore, with the bank listing a company staff as personal guarantor instead of promoter Naresh Goyal. The largest defaulter is fugitive businessman C Sivasankaran’s telecom firm Aircel, which owes INR 4,508 crore

The Seychelles-based promoter of Aircel and Dishnet Wireless owes banks more than INR 20,000 crore. According to the data, one of his company directors, Sudhir Mathur, is listed as personal guarantor to Canara Bank.

Other major defaulters include Shri Lakshmi Cotsyn (INR 3,982 crore), the Lanco Group of former Congress MP L Rajagopal (INR 3,852 crore), Gammon Engineers (INR 3,425 crore), Odisha-based MS Gupta Power Infrastructure (INR 3,303 crore) and companies linked to IL&FS (INR 3,237 crore).

The data shows that in most of these cases the bank has no recoverable collateral apart from personal guarantees. Many loans were sanctioned against company shares whose valuations were later found to be inflated, while several of the companies have since entered insolvency or liquidation.

The records also indicate that several large loans were structured as multiple smaller loans. One example cited is Kolkata-based Nicco Corporation, which is now undergoing insolvency proceedings. The company received 168 separate loans of INR 16.75 crore each from the same Canara Bank branch, amounting to INR 2,815 crore in total.

Other large defaulters include Delhi-based Indure Pvt Ltd (INR 2,770 crore), Winsome Diamonds and Jewellery (INR 2,550 crore), Bengaluru-based Rajesh Exports (INR 2,285 crore), PSL Limited (INR 2,373 crore), Hyderabad-based Gayatri Projects (INR 2,342 crore) and Supreme Housing and Hospitality (INR 2,254 crore). Kolkata-based Rabirun Vinimay Pvt Ltd owes INR 2,024 crore; through the insolvency process, Jindal Steel acquired the company for INR 96 crore, leaving the bank to pursue civil recovery for the remaining dues.

Other borrowers include Concast Steel & Power (INR 1,695 crore), Jay Polychem (INR 1,714 crore), Forever Precious Jewellery and Diamonds (INR 1,364 crore), and DHFL, whose promoters Kapil and Dheeraj Wadhawan face dues exceeding INR 50,000 crore across banks and owe INR 1,250 crore to Canara Bank.

Fugitives Mehul Choksi and Nirav Modi, accused of defrauding Punjab National Bank of over INR 25,000 crore, also borrowed INR 919 crore from Canara Bank. Real estate firm Unitech Ltd owes INR 937 crore, while Trimax IT Infrastructure and Services Ltd has dues of INR 937 crore.

Other defaulters include Mahendra Exports (INR 858 crore), Kolkata-based BBT Elev RD (INR 747 crore), Bibcol (INR 732 crore), Mumbai-based jewellery company Gili India (INR 700 crore), Hyderabad-based IVRCL (INR 790 crore) and Transstroy India Pvt Ltd (INR 653 crore).

EXPECTED DA FOR BANKER FROM MAY 2026 -WE WILL UPDATE AGAIN ON 30.03.2026

Expected DA Calculation Updated on 27.02.26 on the basis of CPI for the month of Jan'26 with the assumptions of CPI for Feb. & Mar...

script async src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js">