Reforming PSU banks
The paper suggests operational independence for boards and management for PSU banks. Rajan and Acharya propose creating a holding company structure for government stakes, a proposal that has been made by a large number of banking reforms committees over the past three decades. The holding company would be responsible for making board appointments. Another suggestion made is for payment by the government to banks for achieving its mandated goals. They argue that banks could reimburse costs for activities like opening bank accounts for all to push lenders to deliver on mandates.
Raghuram Rajan and Viral Acharya add that winding down the Department of Financial Services in the Ministry of Finance is essential for signaling the intent to grant bank boards and management independence. Additionally, they also list longer terms for senior management, better assessment of performance, performance-based promotions and extensions as a reform for the public lenders. The paper also argues about tweaking ownership structures at banks. The duo suggests trimming government stake below 50% in some PSBs and re-privatization of some of these banks.
Improving advances
“The GNPA ratio stood at 8.5% even pre-COVID for the banking sector as a whole, 11.3% for public sector banks (PSBs) and 4.2% for private sector banks,” the paper says. It suggests four reforms for banks to make better loans. Primarily the former RBI Governor and Deputy Governor suggest creating better capital structures for project finance. Further they suggest incorporation of smooth expected provisioning of loan losses in bank regulation with adoption of IFRS. This, they say, would then give incentives to banks to recover on loans by resolving them rather than ever-greening. Rajan and Acharya also suggest transition from asset-based lending to cash-flow based lending and transparency around frauds and group exposures.
No comments:
Post a Comment