No Levy In State Bank
SYNDICATE BANK IS ADAMANT TO DEDUCT ( WITHOUT HAVING MANDATE)) AND REMMIT LEVY TO THE UNION / ASSOCIATION BY ISSUING THE CIRCULAR. THEY SAY THAT IF AN EMPLOYEE DOESNOT WANT TO PAY LEVY THE HE SHOULD REPRESENT TO UNION / ASSOCIATION , WHICH IS TOTALLY ILLEGAL
MASS REPRESENTATION IS REQUIRED. ACT IMMEDIATELY
To,...
The Chairman & Managing Director,
Syndicate Bank,
Head Office: PD : Officer Section.
Manipal Karnatak.
Dated : 01/07/2015.
MASS REPRESENTATION IS REQUIRED. ACT IMMEDIATELY
To,...
The Chairman & Managing Director,
Syndicate Bank,
Head Office: PD : Officer Section.
Manipal Karnatak.
Dated : 01/07/2015.
Dear Sir,
Subject: Association/ Union Levy.
Ref: HO Circular Number 261/2015 BC-PD dated 26.06.2015.
Most respectfully I have to state that the LEVY is imposed by the Bank on the Officers of the Bank of Rs. 3000/- on behalf of the Association wide Page number 42 & 43 clause 10 of the refered circular Number 261/2015 BC-PD dated 26.06.2015.
I would like to draw your kind attention that I have given the mandate to deduct the monthly membership contribution of AIBOC only. No any other mandate is given to Bank for deducting any other type of amount. Hence Sir, no such type of Levy can be imposed by the Bank without having mandate from the me.
Further I want to state that the contribution towards such union / Association is voluntary upon its members and Bank cannot impose upon the employee .
In view of Sec. 16 under Schedule III of Trade Union Act 1926, in which it is stated that a contribution to trade union other than the compulsory monthly contribution will be optional and will not effect the ordinary membership of any employee.
Further, In refered circular Number 261/2015 BC-PD dated 26.06.2015 stated that “BANK WILL NOT ENTERTAINED ANY REPRESENTATION IN THIS REGARD”. When the bank is not authorised to deduct such type of contributions ( without mandate), how the Bank can deduct from the employee and credit the Association account. And why the Officers representation made to the Association/ union for the amount deducted by the bank without authority?
Sir, I represent this case to your good office for kindly consider the case and issue necessary guideline such that to make such contribution voluntary on the part of member of such Association/ Union, rather than imposing forcefully is violation of the Law of Land.
Thanking you,
(Ashok Kumar Saxena)
Subject: Association/ Union Levy.
Ref: HO Circular Number 261/2015 BC-PD dated 26.06.2015.
Most respectfully I have to state that the LEVY is imposed by the Bank on the Officers of the Bank of Rs. 3000/- on behalf of the Association wide Page number 42 & 43 clause 10 of the refered circular Number 261/2015 BC-PD dated 26.06.2015.
I would like to draw your kind attention that I have given the mandate to deduct the monthly membership contribution of AIBOC only. No any other mandate is given to Bank for deducting any other type of amount. Hence Sir, no such type of Levy can be imposed by the Bank without having mandate from the me.
Further I want to state that the contribution towards such union / Association is voluntary upon its members and Bank cannot impose upon the employee .
In view of Sec. 16 under Schedule III of Trade Union Act 1926, in which it is stated that a contribution to trade union other than the compulsory monthly contribution will be optional and will not effect the ordinary membership of any employee.
Further, In refered circular Number 261/2015 BC-PD dated 26.06.2015 stated that “BANK WILL NOT ENTERTAINED ANY REPRESENTATION IN THIS REGARD”. When the bank is not authorised to deduct such type of contributions ( without mandate), how the Bank can deduct from the employee and credit the Association account. And why the Officers representation made to the Association/ union for the amount deducted by the bank without authority?
Sir, I represent this case to your good office for kindly consider the case and issue necessary guideline such that to make such contribution voluntary on the part of member of such Association/ Union, rather than imposing forcefully is violation of the Law of Land.
Thanking you,
(Ashok Kumar Saxena)
No comments:
Post a Comment